Method of forming quantum-mechanical memory and computational devices and devices obtained thereof

ABSTRACT

The present invention discloses a quantum system comprising computational elements, consisting of an insulated ring of superconductive material, and semi-closed rings, which are used as an interface or input/output facility between the quantum bit and the external world. Faraday induction is used to provide electromagnetic coupling between adjacent computational elements and between the computational elements with interface elements of the quantum system. Therefore the corresponding magnetic flux acts as an information carrier. Ferromagnetic cores are used to improve the magnetic coupling between adjacent elements of the quantum system.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to, and hereby incorporates byreference in its entirety, U.S. provisional application No. 60/390,883,filed Jun. 21, 2002, now abandoned and entitled “METHOD FOR FORMINGQUANTUM-MECHANICAL MEMORY AND COMPUTATIONAL DEVICES AND DEVICES OBTAINEDTHEREOF.”

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to memory and computational devices basedon quantum-mechanical interaction between individual bits. Moreparticularly the present invention relates to solid-state devicescomprising a ring structure as basic element for storing a single bit ofinformation.

2. Description of the Related Art

During the last decade, quantum computing has become a topic of evergrowing interest, particularly in the field of cryptographyapplications, based on Shor's algorithm for factoring large integers asdisclosed by P. W. Shor in “Algorithms for quantum computing: discretelogarithms and factoring” in Proc. 35^(th) Annual symposium on thefoundations of computer science, 1994, pp124–123, which is incorporatedherein in its entirety by reference. This is due to the fact that thequantum-mechanical superposition principle allows for a level ofparallel computing that exceeds all classical methods in this field.

A characteristic that differentiates quantum computing from classicalcomputing is the entanglement of the bits. Also in classical computingdevices operating at atomic scale is being developed. Although these“quantum devices” use discrete charge quanta the value of each bit iswell defined: either a “0” or a “1”. In quantum computing however theinterference between subsequent bits may bring the system in entangledmultibit states, which are not accessible in classical computing.

All implementations of such a quantum computer starts with the design ofan individual unit of information processing, the so-called quantum bitor “qbit”.

A first series of approaches addresses the design of this quantum bit atatomic level. The single qbit is realized e.g. as a spinning electron,an atomic nucleus or an oscillating molecule. Whereas these approachesdirectly address the quantum scale, they lack the connection of the qbitto the outside world: input/output structures (I/) ports are not easilyavailable. PCT International Publication No. WO 00/30255, entitled“Crystal Lattice Quantum Computer”, published on May 25, 2002, which isincorporated herein in its entirety by reference, shows a crystallattice computer where the qbit is associated with the orientation ofthe nuclear spin of the atoms.

A second series of similar approaches forms quantum systems but on alarger, nano- or mesoscopic, scale such as quantum dots, nanometer-sizedrings or quantum wires. Although these devices are larger than thedevices of the first approach, they operate similarly as if thesedevices where “artificial or macro-atoms”. Quantum dots are microscopic,carefully tailored regions of a semiconductor surface in which thenumber of electrons is precisely controlled. Axel Lorke et al. disclosesin “Spectroscopy of nanoscopic semiconductor rings”, Phys. Rev Letter84, March 2000, which is incorporated herein in its entirety byreference, the manufacturing of an array of semiconductor quantum ringsstarting from InAs droplets formed on a GaAs surface. The minute ringsallow one or two electrons to circulate in coherent quantum statescorresponding to one of the values of a bit. These quantum states aredependent on the applied large external magnetic field of about 8 Tesla,as was shown by externally providing energy in the form of infraredradiation having the appropriate wavelength to allow transitions betweenthese magnetic-field-dependant quantum states. This external magneticfield is applied uniform over the nanoscopic ring as the rings arepositioned in-between two parallel plates. Although the authorssucceeded in forming qbits on an above-atomic scale, no mention of I/Oports is indicated and the proposed device are for research purposeonly, without giving any information about integration, even of a singleqbit, in a CMOS (complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor) compatibletechnology.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

All drawings are intended to illustrate some aspects and embodiments ofthe present invention. Devices and fabrication steps are depicted in asimplified way for reason of clarity. Not all alternatives and optionsare shown and therefore the invention is not limited to the content ofthe given drawings.

FIG. 1A illustrates a single closed ring of a quantum system accordingto the present invention.

FIG. 1B is a ring system with open input and output elements,magnetically coupled using a ferromagnetic core.

FIG. 1C is a matrix of closed rings and open input and output elements.

FIGS. 1D, 1E and 1F illustrate alternative embodiments of thecomputational elements.

FIGS. 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, and 2E illustrate the switching of the quantumstate of a computational element in accordance with the presentinvention.

FIG. 2F shows an example of an input signal.

FIG. 3A shows a sandwich of plates and FIG. 3B shows overlappingelements for improving the magnetic coupling between the elements of thequantum system according to the present invention.

FIG. 4A, FIG. 4B, FIG. 4C, FIG. 4D, FIG. 4E, FIG. 4F, and FIG. 4G aremethods for manufacturing a quantum system in accordance with anembodiment of the invention,

FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B and FIG. 5C are methods for manufacturing a quantumsystem in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A first object of the invention is to offer a quantum device forhandling and/or storing bits having a well-defined two-dimensionalmathematical basis.

Another object of the invention is to offer a quantum computational ormemory device comprising I/O facilities, which do not affect, during orbefore read-out of bits, the quantum states of the individual bits tothe extent that information is lost. This device further allows areproducible preparation of the initial state of the qbit afterread-out.

Another object of the invention is to offer a quantum computational ormemory device having coherence times that are longer than thecomputation times.

Another object of the invention is to offer a method for forming quantumcomputational or memory devices in a reproducible and scalable fashionallowing the implementation of these devices on a chip. This methodfurther allows the formation of I/O ports connecting the qbit to theperipheral circuitry of such chip or to the external world. Preferablythe quantum device can be integrated in a semiconductor substrate, usingsemiconductor-processing techniques.

These objectives are met in the present invention by proposing asuperconducting quantum ring as a computational or datastoring element.More specifically this quantum bit or qbit state of such a quantum ringis related to the absence or presence of persistent currents to begenerated by means of a magnetic field.

Coupling between the quantum rings in a matrix and between these quantumrings and these input-output structures is established by inducedmagnetic fields generated by the currents flowing in the quantum ringsand in the input-output structures. The quantum rings are closedstructures in which a closed current flow path is possible. The currentflowing along such closed current flow path will create a magneticfield. The quantum ring is a topological space of genus 1. The quantumring is a closed structure only having one hole. Preferably the quantumrings have a circular cross-section. Preferably the quantum ring hasrounded corners. Preferably the quantum rings have a torus ordoughnut-like shape also known as toroid. The input-output structuresare discontinuous, semi-closed or open rings having two terminals, whichcan be connected to a power source. The current flowing from this powersource along a semi-closed path in the input structure will create amagnetic field as well. The current flowing through one element, e.g.I/O element, qbit, will create a magnetic field, which will induce acurrent in another element, which encloses the field lines of thisinduced magnetic field and as such this subsequent element ismagnetically coupled to the previous element.

In one embodiment, the invention provides a device comprising at leasttwo computational elements, each computational element being shaped as aring-like structure. Each computational element is magnetically coupledto at least one adjacent computational element. The device furthercomprises an interface structure configured to provide magnetic accessto the computational elements.

In another embodiment, the invention provides a method of forming adevice comprising at least two computational elements. The methodcomprises depositing on a substrate a superconductive material. Themethod further comprises patterning said superconductive material toform the at least two computational elements and at least oneinput-output element. The method further comprises depositing aninsulating layer on at least a portion of said patterned computationalelements and said patterned input-output element. In yet anotherembodiment, the invention provides a method of performing a quantumcomputation. The method comprises applying a magnetic pulse to acomputational element. The method further comprises causing a change inthe conductive state of said computational element from superconductingto ohmic conduction, the change being responsive to applying themagnetic pulse.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

In relation to the appended drawings the present invention is describedin detail in the sequel. It is apparent however that a person skilled inthe art can imagine several other equivalent embodiments or other waysof executing the present invention, the spirit and scope of the presentinvention being limited only by the terms of the appended claims.

In a first aspect the quantization of the information in the quantum bitis disclosed. The quantization of the information in the structureaccording to the present invention is obtained by using superconductingrings to trap multiples of the magnetic flux quantum in order tomaintain persistent currents within the qbit. These flux quantacorresponds to clearly distinct and discrete energy levels.

Deep inside of a superconducting material, no magnetic field will bepresent. If an external magnetic field were to be applied to suchsuperconducting structure this external field would be pushed outwardsof the structure. Such perfect diamagnetism is an inherent property ofsuperconductivity and is called the Meissner-effect. Because of theMeissner-effect the external magnetic field will decay exponentially tozero towards the bulk of superconducting structure. This reduction inmagnetic field requires the presence of a superconducting currentflowing at the outer and/or inner surface of the superconductorstructure, the induced field of which cancels the external field insidethe superconductor. Apart from the transition region near the surfacethe magnetic field and the current density inside the superconductingstructure will therefore be zero. The surface currents of the structurewill adjust themselves if the external magnetic field is changed. Thedepth of the transition region is characterized by the so-calledLondon-penetration depth λ_(L) as shown in the following expression forbulk materials at 0 Kelvin, whereby q is twice the electron charge, M iseffective mass of a Cooper pair which is twice the effective mass of anelectron, μ₀ is the permeability of the bulk material, n_(s) is thedensity of Cooper pairs which is function of temperature T and magneticfield H:

$\begin{matrix}{\lambda_{L} \approx {\frac{1}{q}\sqrt{\frac{M}{\mu_{0}n_{s}}}}} & (1)\end{matrix}$

The London-penetration depth λ_(L) is a characteristic of thesuperconducting material: in case of Aluminum λ_(L) is about 16 nm at 0Kelvin. In order to have a complete Meissner effect at all surfaces, theouter surface of the superconducting structure must have a minimalspacing in-between so that the transition regions of each surface willnot overlap. Preferably the minimal spacing is much larger than theLondon-penetration depth at a given temperature.

For a ring shaped superconducting structure (1), as shown in FIG. 1A,one can calculate the magnetic flux going through the ring given thefact that the current and the magnetic inside this ring (1) is zero dueto the Meissner effect. Using Ginzburg-London theory it follows that thecurrent density J in the ring is given by

$\begin{matrix}{\overset{\rightarrow}{J} = {\frac{{- n_{s}}q}{M}\left( {{\hslash{\overset{\rightarrow}{\nabla}\theta}} + {q\;\overset{\rightarrow}{A}}} \right)}} & (2)\end{matrix}$

with n being the electron concentration, q twice the electron charge, Mthe effective mass of a Cooper pair,

reduced Planck's constant, A the vector potential and θ the quantummechanical phase. Since the current density J has to be zero inside thering, one concludes:

{right arrow over (∇)}θ=−q{right arrow over (A)}  (3)

Taking the integral along a closed contour “C” inside the ring and usingStokes's theorem to convert a line integral along a contour “C” into asurface integral over the area “O” enclosed by this contour “C”, one canshown that the magnetic flux Φ through this area “O” is equal to

$\begin{matrix}{\Phi = {{s\;\Phi_{0}\mspace{14mu}{where}\mspace{14mu}\Phi_{0}} = \left( \frac{2\;\pi\;\hslash}{q} \right)}} & (4)\end{matrix}$with s being an integer.

Formula 4 shows that magnetic flux Φ through the ring can only be aninteger multiple of the elementary flux quantum Φ₀, which is equal to2.067810 10⁻¹⁵ Weber.

For a given external field the superconducting current flowing at thesurface of the ring will be such that the total flux through the ringmeets the requirement of equation (4): the sum of the magnetic flux froman external magnetic field and the magnetic flux induced by thesuperconducting current, will always be a multiple of the elementaryflux quantum Φ₀.

The present invention uses the quantization of magnetic flux through asuperconducting structure (1) to create a qbit. By using superconductivematerials, e.g. preferably Type I superconductors such as Alumium,Nobium, Lead, Tantalum to create a closed loop structure or torus (1) asshown in FIG. 1A, the resulting superconducting structure (1) can trapmultiples of the so-called elementary or London flux quantum by having acorresponding amount of superconducting current flowing in the ring (1).The logic states of the qbit, e.g. |0> state, |1> states now correspondto a certain magnetic flux quantum which is related to the absence orpresence of a certain amount of current flowing in the ring. Thequantization is not a result from a shrinking of the dimensions of thestructure. Superconducting rings can sustain persistent currents also atlarger dimensions. Typically the rings according to the presentinvention have a diameter larger than 70 nm even within the micrometerrange, while superconducting rings have been manufactured havingdimensions in the centimeter range. Hence this present inventionalleviates the need for very small rings and simplifies the productionof qbit structures. Processing techniques already available insemiconductor processes which allow the manufacturing and integrating ofquantum bits in semiconductor chips as will be shown later on. This waythe superconducting rings offer a better approach for integratingquantum bit devices with peripheral circuitry, which can be CMOS-basedcircuitry, while still offering the occurrence of quantum-like behavior.The present invention allows the manufacturing and integrating ofquantum bits in semiconductor chips. Although the basic computationalelement is described as a ring the invention is not limited hereto. Moregenerally one could describe this element (1) as a torus or as atopological space of genus 1; it is closed loop structure having one andonly one hole in it. The structure itself can have various shapes:circular, elliptical, and polygonal. Preferably the structure hasrounded corners. The diameter of the ring is preferably in the range of1 to 150 micrometer, while the thickness, i.e. the difference betweeninner and outer diameter, of the ring would preferably in the range of 1to 40 micrometer, preferably 1 to 20 micrometer. The minimum height ofthe ring is preferably 0.3 micrometer.

A superconductive material will loose its superconducting property oncethe temperature T exceeds a critical temperature T_(c). A temperatureincrease in a superconductor can be caused by external events, e.g.heating, radiation, but also by internal events such as heat dissipationor energy losses within the superconductor due to normal currents, e.g.when switching the quantum states or by eddy currents in the corecoupling two elements (1,2,3). Even if the temperature is below thiscritical temperature superconductivity will break down if he externalmagnetic field H is above a critical magnetic field H_(c) or, for agiven material, the corresponding magnetic inductance B_(c). Aluminumfor example is a superconductive material having a critical temperatureT_(c) of about 1.23 Kelvin and, below this critical temperature, acritical magnetic inductance B_(c) of about 10 milliTesla. Both thecritical magnetic field H_(c) and the critical temperature T_(c) arematerial dependent. Preferably materials are used having a transition orcritical temperature above 1 Kelvin. The superconducting state of aconductor is also characterized by the “coherence length” which is ameasure for the stability of the superconducting region or spatialcoherence between electrons in a superconducting phase. The coherencelength ξ₀ of Aluminum is about 1.6 micrometer.

Thus if the magnetic field H in a superconductor exceeds the criticalvalue H_(c) of this superconductor the conductor will loose itssuperconducting state. A magnetic field can originate from an externalsource or can be induced by the superconducting current itself. If thesuperconducting current density increases due to a time-dependentelectric field circulating in the ring, it will exceed a critical valueJ_(c), corresponding to an induced critical value H_(c). Then the ringswitches to the normal state and ohmic dissipation sets in, while themagnetic field inside the ring increases. The superconducting state ofthe ring is lost. This property is used to switch the quantum state ofthe qbit (1). By applying an external magnetic field the superconductorcurrent flowing at the inner and/or outer side of the ring (1) willincrease to compensate this external magnetic field. Finally the currentdensity can be increased above the critical current density J_(c). Atthis moment the conductor looses its superconducting state and a normali.e. not-superconducting, current will flow through the ring. Thisnormal current can transfer part of its kinetic energy to the crystallattice of the conductor resulting in a decrease of the current densitybelow the critical value J_(c). The component of the total flux throughthe ring, which is in the direction of the external field, will increaseas the component generated by the current through the ring is decreased.The ring can lower its total energy by becoming superconducting again,be it that the magnetic flux corresponding to the new current densitywill differ from the original flux. The superconducting current requiredto maintain the new quantum of magnetic flux is now below the criticalcurrent density by one flux quantum. Applying an input flux thus changesthe quantum state of a qbit, which result in a current exceeding thecritical current density. Preferably only the intended magnetic fieldshould affect the operation of the qbit and the quantum system should beshielded from other, unwanted magnetic fields.

This mechanism is schematically illustrated in FIGS. 2A–e, for the caseof two adjacent computational elements (1), however the mechanism isalso applied in the case an input (2) element adjacent to acomputational element (1) or a computational element (1) adjacent to anoutput (3) element. In these FIGS. 2A–e not only these elements will beshown which are relevant to explain the mechanism of changing quantumstate. FIG. 2A shows a vertical cross-section through the two rings (1),while the core (7) is not shown. In this example no current is flowingand no magnetic field is present. The absence of the magnetic field isindicated by stating that the flux through the opening in the rightelement is zero: Φ=0. A time-dependent magnetic field H_(ext) is appliedto the ring on the right, as is indicated in FIG. 2B by the dashedcounter line corresponding to the magnetic field lines. This appliedfield is, in this example, labelled the external magnetic field todistinguish it from the magnetic field generated by the superconductingcurrent in the right ring. The latter field will be labeled the inducedmagnetic field H_(ind). The external magnetic field results from a timedependent electrical field, e.g. a current flowing in the ring on theleft: if this ring as an input ring (2) then this current is appliedfrom the circuitry surrounding the quantum system, if this ring is acomputational element (1) this current is the persistent superconductingcurrent flowing in this closed ring (1). In the ring on the left thiscurrent is indicated by a black dot on the right (current flowing intothe page) and a crossed circle on the right (current coming out of thepage), corresponding to the direction in which the current flows. Duethe Meissner effect the total magnetic field H_(tot) inside thesuperconducting right ring must be zero: the external magnetic fieldH_(ext) is compensated inside the superconducting right ring by aninduced magnetic field H_(ind). Within a distance from the border of thering, characterized by the London penetration depth λ_(L), the totalmagnetic field H_(tot) will not be zero but, as explained above decay inan exponential way. The field lines of the induced magnetic field areindicated only on the left part of the ring on the right. This inducedmagnetic field is generated by a superconducting current, which willflow at the inner and outer surfaces of the right ring as indicated bythe black dots at the left and by the crossed circles at the right ofthis ring.

As shown in FIG. 2D the total magnetic field H_(tot) near the borders ofthe right ring will exceed the critical magnetic field H_(c) and thecurrent density J of the superconducting current in the right ringexceeds a critical current density J_(c), whereby the conductor loosesits superconducting state and a normal i.e. not-superconducting orohmic, current will flow through the ring. The magnetic field lines willimpinge on the ring and penetrate not only near the border but also overthe whole of the ring. The electrons will not be part of a Cooper pairand they will loose their kinetic energy by dissipation. Consequentlythe current density, which is function of the speed of the electrons,decreases below the critical current density J_(c) and the right ringbecomes superconducting again. Contrary to the initial state shown inFIG. 2A there are field lines present within the core of the right ringas shown in FIG. 2E. Because the right ring is superconducting again theMeissner effect comes in to play: within the superconducting right ringa persistent current will remain which will cancel the magnetic fieldinside this ring, but this persistent current will be such that the fluxthrough the hole is a integer multiple of the quantum flux, expressed inequation 4.

FIG. 2F gives an example of such an external magnetic field. A pulse isapplied resulting in a magnetic field H_(ext) of a first sign above aminimal level H_(min) required to program the quantum bit with onequantum flux. If the quantum ring is to be erased an external magneticfield of an opposite sign is applied.

In a second aspect of the invention the quantum bit structure and itsinput/output structure are disclosed.

In a first embodiment of the second aspect a quantum bit structure isdisclosed. The present invention discloses the design of qbits realizedas mesoscopic conducting rings. These objects offer a compromise betweenthe atomic or molecular level and nanostructure level and allows aquantum behavior, yet large enough to be manufactured usingsemiconductor processing techniques in a reproducible way and to allowfor I/O ports. In particular sets of metal rings are considered,including in- and output devices or structures. The quantum-likebehavior of the proposed qbit is the quantization of the magnetic fluxtrapped by the conducting or super-conducting ring as explained above.

FIG. 1B shows a three-ring structure (1,2,3), wherein the ring structure(1) is the basic element of a quantum computer according to the presentinvention. The qbit (1) is located in between two semi-closed rings(2,3). These semi-closed rings can be connected to bonding pads (4)which in turn can be connected to the interconnect circuitry of asemiconductor chip or circuit. This semi-closed or open ring thus servesas an in (2)- or output (3) structure and enables an easy access fromthe external world to the quantum system. Applying an externaltime-dependent current signal I_(in) to the bonding pads of the inputstructure (2) of the quantum system would produce a changing magneticflux Φ_(in) which can induce, in its turn, a current I_(super) in the“free”, isolated closed ring (1) adjacent to and magnetically coupled tothis input port (2). The isolated ring (1) is the computational basicelement of the quantum system. The current I_(super) generated in thefree ring (1) can also induce by a magnetic flux Φ_(out) a current in aneighboring, magnetically coupled, ring and so on. This neighboring ringcan be the output port (3) of the quantum system and the correspondingcurrent I_(out) generated in this output ring (3) can be read out at thebonding pad connected to the output ring (3). The electromagnetic fieldsgenerated by the current flowing trough the semi-closed or closedelements (1,2,3) are used as information carrier in the quantum system.The three elements could be of equal size, but the input/output ringsmight have larger dimensions if needed for connection or heatdissipation purposes without effecting the device operation. The openinput (2) and/or the output (3) ring can be conceived as a solenoid. Inthis case the output signal will be amplified with the number of turns,as is the case in a classical transformer.

FIG. 1C shows a schematic representation of quantum computer accordingto the present invention comprising a matrix of n by m (both integers)freestanding, electrically isolated qbits (1), which areelectro-magnetically coupled, with each other (7) and with (5,6) the I/O(input-output) structures (2,3). As can be seen from this figure the I/Ostructures (2,3) are on the outer edge of the two-dimensional plane ofcomputational elements (1). The I/O structures (2,3) areinterchangeable: the input ring can also be used as an output ringdepending on the direction in which the information flows. The operationof such a quantum computer is depending on the computational algorithmused.

Alternative arrangements are shown in FIGS. 1E to 1F. FIG. 1E shows abasic quantum computer comprising two computational elements (1) of asuperconducting material. The two computational elements (1) aremagnetically coupled using a ferromagnetic core (7) whereby eachcomputational element (1) is respectively linked with one of the twolegs of the core (7). The two qbits (1) can be in entangled stateresulting from a quantum-mechanical interaction between the two qbits(1). Both qbits (1) are magnetically accessible: magnetic fields can beinduced and applied to the qbits (1) in order to apply the desired fluxquantum when programming, these flux quantum will result in a certainamount of persistent current in the qbit (1), or magnetic fields can besensed when reading the outcome of the computational operation. Inducingand sensing of magnetic fields can be done using superconducting quantuminterference devices (SQUID) or by using magnetic force microscopy. FIG.1E shows the quantum computer of FIG. 1 in which for inducing or forsensing of the magnetic field a semi-closed structure (2,3) is used.This semi-closed structure (2,3) is magnetically coupled to an adjacentcomputational element (1) using a ferromagnetic core (5,6). A currentflowing through this semi-closed structure (2,3) will induce a magneticfield, which will result in a persistent current in the computationalelement (1). In its turn such a persistent current, more precisely theflux quantum generating this current can induce a current in a adjacentsemi-closed structure (2,3) which is magnetically coupled to thiscomputational element (1). FIG. 1F shows the quantum computer of FIG. 1Ewherein for inducing (2) as well as for sensing (3) the magnetic fieldssemi-closed structures (2,3) are used. One semi-closed structure (2) isused as input element to induce a magnetic flux quantum, which ismagnetically coupled (5) to an adjacent computational element (1). Thiscomputational element (1) is magnetically coupled (7) to anotheradjacent computational element (1), which in its turn is magneticallycoupled (6) to another semi-closed structure (3). This semi-closesstructure (3) is used as an output element to sense the induced magneticfield.

In a second embodiment of the second aspect methods and means forimproving the magnetic coupling between the elements of the quantum bitdevice are disclosed. The quantization of the information carried by themagnetic flux as well as the guidance of the magnetic flux betweenadjacent rings as well as is a feature of the present invention. Alarger amount of the magnetic field lines is found to spread out inspace and therefore appropriate flux guiding has to be achieved tominimize or cancel information loss, thereby setting the classical basisfor the disclosed device. The better the magnetic coupling between theqbits (1) amongst themselves and between the qbits and the I/Ostructures (2,3), the better the coherence between the individual bits.

FIG. 3A illustrates an embodiment in which the magnetic coupling betweenthe elements of the quantum system is improved by sandwiching thequantum system between two plates (7) of superconducting material. Dueto the Meissner effect the magnetic field is confined within the top andbottom plates (7). The dotted lines denotes the magnetic field squeezeddue the Meissner effect of superconducting top and bottom plate (7).This way more magnetic field lines will pass through the core ofadjacent rings.

FIG. 3B illustrates an embodiment in which the magnetic coupling isimproved by positioning the elements (1,2,3) of the quantum systemalternating in different planes and having the rings (1,2,3) partiallyoverlapping each other. In this embodiment the structures (1,2,3) arealternately formed on different planes. Within each plane the structureis positioned so as to at least overlap partially with the structuresformed on a plane above or below the plane at which the currentstructure is positioned. The floating ring (1) shares two cores with theinput (2) and output (3) ring. The in- and output rings are situated ina ground plane, whereas the free ring is put in an adjacent level withpreferably half of its area above the input port and half of it coveringthe output port.

FIG. 1B illustrates a preferred embodiment in which the magneticcoupling is improved by including a ferromagnetic core (5,6,7) betweenthe elements (1,2,3) to create a transformer-like structure.Ferromagnetic cores between the rings are used similar to the case of atransformer in macro-scale transformers. These cores should be fullyclosed and pass through the holes of the elements (1,2,3) withouttouching them. Preferably a soft permalloy with a high permeability isused, such as Nickel-Iron. As shown in FIG. 1B, the input ring (2) andthe qbit (1) are connected by a metal core (5) thereby forming atransformer. The magnetic field lines giving rise to a flux Φ_(in) areconcentrated within this core and the field losses are reduced. As shownin FIG. 1C for a quantum system each element in the array of the qbitcells is connected with its neighboring qbits by a metal core (7) orwith an input/output element (2,3) by a metal core (5,6). In thisexample each qbit (1) shares 4 cores (5,6,7) with its adjacent qbits (1)or with an I/O element (2,3). The cross-sectional area of the coreshould preferably be as large as possible and constant along the core asthis will determine the maximum magnetic inductance B in the core. Thevertical part (5 b, 6 b) of the core should cover as much as possiblethe area of the ring opening without touching the ring itself. The top(5 c, 6 c) and bottom parts (5 a, 6 a) of the core should preferably beas thick as possible.

Note that the input/output elements (2,3) are not coupled with adjacentinput/output elements (2,3). These elements (2,3) are in directelectrical contact with the outside world and consequently theseelements are generally not in a superconducting state. These elements(2,3) should have a good normal conductivity.

In a third aspect of the invention alternative process sequences aregiven to manufacture the quantum bit of the present invention in afashion, compatible with semiconductor or CMOS Processing. An advantageof the invention is that process steps and methods known insemiconductor processing can be used to manufacture the devices. Metallayers can be deposited using e.g. Chemical-Vapour-Deposition (CVD),Physical-Vapour-Deposition (PVD), sputtering techniques, spin-on orelectrochemical plating techniques. Dielectric layers can be formed e.g.by CVD, by spin-on depositing techniques. Dielectric layers can beplanarized by using chemical-mechanical-polishing (CMP, by etch-back oflayers, by coating layers with spin-on-materials. Layers are patternedusing lithographic processes in which a pattern is transferred by usinge.g. optical, Ultra-Violet or E-beam lithography to a photosensitivelayer formed on this layer. This patterned photosensitive layer can thenbe used to transfer the pattern to the underlying layer(s) andafterwards the photosensitive layer is removed leaving only thepatterned layer. This transfer can be done by using wet etching, dryetching or by lift-off techniques. Where appropriate cleaning steps willbe performed to deposition steps or after removal steps. Persons skilledin semiconductor process technology know all such steps.

In the light of the above, a person skilled in the art would realizethat for ease of processing using state-of-the-art technology all layeror structure heights should preferably be in the range of 50 to 300nanometer, but less than 5 micrometer.

In a first embodiment of the third aspect a process sequence isdisclosed which doesn't require the use of electrochemical depositionprocesses. The process sequence is illustrated in FIGS. 4A–g, whichcorresponds to the basic set of 3 elements (1,2,3) shown in FIG. 1B. Aperson skilled in the art will appreciate that this process sequence canalso be used to form a quantum system illustrated in FIG. 1C. Forexample the parts of core (6) between isolated rings (1) is formedtogether with their counterparts of the cores (5,6,) connecting theqbits (1) with the I/O rings (2,3).

First a substrate (10) is provided as shown in FIG. 4A. This substratecan be a semiconductor substrate as used in CMOS processing: silicon,silicon-on-insulator, germanium, gallium-arsenide. The substrate canalso be a ceramic or thin-film substrate. The substrate can be a blanketsubstrate, optionally covered with a dielectric layer, e.g. an oxide.Electronic circuitry might already be present on this substrate, e.g.transistors might already be formed, interconnect levels might bepresent. Such underlying electronic circuitry is covered with aninsulating layer separating the quantum structures from underlyingdevices or conductors.

On top of this substrate (10) the bottom part (5 a, 6 a) of the cores(5,6) is formed. A layer of a first metal (11) is deposited andpatterned to form the bottom part of the cores as shown in FIG. 4B. Thisfirst metal is made of a magnetic material, preferably a soft permalloysuch as NiFe or an alloy thereof. This material, which will be part ofthe core, should have a high saturation magnetic field and a lowhysterisis.

As shown in FIG. 4C the bottom part (5 a, 6 a) of the cores (5,6) iscovered with a first dielectric layer (12), which will form part of theinsulation between the cores (5,6) and the rings (1,2,3) of the quantumsystem. The outer surface of this first dielectric layer (11) shouldpreferably be planar in order to control topographical effects on therings (1,2,3), which will be formed on this surface. Optionally aplanarisation step such as CMP can be applied, in which an initialthicker layer is polished down to the desired layer thickness andplanarity. This first dielectric layer can be an oxide or nitride layer.

On top of this first dielectric layer (12) the bonding pads (4, notshown), input (2)/outputs (3) elements, the qbits (1) are formed. Asecond metal layer (13) is deposited on the first dielectric layer (12)and patterned to form respectively the bonding pads (not shown)connected to the input ring (2), the input ring (2), the isolated ring(1), the output ring (3) and the bonding pads (4) connected to theoutput ring (3). This second metal layer is a layer of a superconductivematerial such as a metal (Aluminum, Niobium). The ring structures(1,2,3) are patterned such that the bottom part (5 a, 6 a) of the coresoverlaps with the opening of the corresponding rings. The opening of theinput (2)/output (3) rings is aligned with the outer end of respectivelythe bottom parts (5 a, 6 a), while the opening of the qbit (1) isaligned with the inner ends of both bottom parts (5 a, 6 a) as shown inFIG. 4D.

As shown in FIG. 4E the substrate is again covered with a dielectriclayer (14), which will form part of the insulation between the cores(5,6) and the rings (1,2,3) of the quantum system. The outer surface ofthis second dielectric layer (14) should preferably be planar in orderto control topographical effects rings (1,2,3), which will be formed onthis surface. Optionally a planarisation step such as CMP can beapplied, in which an initial thicker layer is polished down to thedesired layer thickness and planarity. This second dielectric layer canbe e.g. an oxide or nitride layer.

As shown in FIG. 4 f openings (15) are formed throughout the first (12)and second (14) dielectric layers to expose the first metal layer (11).These openings (15) are aligned with the openings of the rings (1,2,3)and with the ends of the bottom parts (5 a, 6 a). The openings (15) canbe etched stopping on the first metal layer (11) or on the substrate(10) underneath this first metal layer (11). Optionally a dedicatedlayer (not shown) can be provided on top of the first metal layer (11)or on top of the substrate (10) to be used as an etch stop layer.Preferably this etch stop layer also is selected from the group ofmagnetic materials. If a non-magnetic material is used as etch-stoplayer, this layer should be removed as to expose the first metal layer(11) at the bottom of the openings (15). These openings will later on bemetallised to constitute the uprising or vertical parts (5 b, 6 b) ofthe cores (5,6) connecting the bottom (5 a, 6 a) and top (5 b, 6 b)parts of the cores (5,6).

After forming the openings (15) a second metal layer (16) is depositedover the substrate. This second metal layer is patterned to form the topparts (5 c, 6 c) of the cores (5,6), which overlap the openings (15)whereby the second metal layer (15) covers at least the sidewalls andthe bottom of the openings (15) in order to form the vertical parts (5b, 6 b) of the cores (5,6) contacting the bottom and the top parts ofthe cores as shown in FIG. 4 g.

Additionally a passivation layer (not shown) can be deposited over thesubstrate to protect the quantum system. This passivation layer can bee.g. a bilayer of oxide and nitride or a monolayer thereof. Openings areetched in this passivation layer to expose the bonding pads (4, notshown) in order to allow contacting of the quantum system.

In a second embodiment of the third aspect a process sequence isdisclosed which uses electrochemical deposition processes, in thisexample electroplating. The process sequence is illustrated in FIGS.4A–c, which corresponds to the basic set of 3 elements (1,2,3) shown inFIG. 1B.

After providing a substrate (10) a conductive layer (18) is deposited asshown in FIG. 5A. This conductive layer (18) will be used during theelectroplating process. Preferably this conductive layer (18) is anon-magnetic metal such as Copper or Gold as to prevent leakage ofmagnetic field lines from the cores (5,6,7) and unwanted coupling ofqbits via this common conductive layer (18).

The processing steps of the embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 4A–g areused: formation of the bottom parts of the cores, deposition of a firstdielectric layer (12), formation of the bonding pads (4) and rings(1,2,3), deposition of a second dielectric layer (14), opening of thecontact holes (15), deposition and patterning of a second metal layer(16) to form the top parts (5 c, 6 c) of the cores (5,6) overlapping theopenings (15) whereby the second metal layer (15) covers at least thesidewalls and the bottom of the openings (15). (see FIG. 5A).

In order to increase the thickness of the core (5,6) an electroplatingprocess is used. During this process the conductive layer (18) is biasedand additional magnetic material is deposited on the patterned secondmetal layer (15) to increase the thickness of the vertical (5 b, 6 b)and top parts (5 c, 6 c) of the cores (5,6). (see FIG. 5C). Optionallyalso the thickness of the bottom parts (5 a, 6 a) can be increased by anapplying an electroplating process to add additional magnetic materialto these bottom parts prior to the deposition of the first dielectriclayer (12). In yet another option electroplating is used to fill theopenings (15) with magnetic material and afterwards the second metallayer (16) is deposited over the substrate. This second metal layer ispatterned to form the top parts (5 c, 6 c) of the cores (5,6), whichoverlap the already filled openings (15).

Additionally a passivation layer (not shown) can be deposited over thesubstrate to protect the quantum system. This passivation layer can bee.g. a bilayer of oxide and nitride or a monolayer thereof. Openings areetched in this passivation layer to expose the bonding pads (4) in orderto allow contacting of the quantum system.

A preferred embodiment of the invention is disclosed below.

Structures were designed, consisting of basic aluminum ring arrangements(in- (2) and out (3) put rings and computing element (1)) as well as theferromagnetic cores (5,6,7), made of nickel-iron (NiFe). Aluminum is atype I superconductor and the samples that are used in-house are foundto be superconducting for temperatures below 1.23 K. NiFe has a relativepermeability of about 75000. The structures are designed for evaluationpurposes in such a way that it is possible to perform electricalmeasurements as well as low temperature measurements using magneticforce microscopy (MFM). These experiments enabled us to verify atransformer-type effect of magnetic coupling and also if the fluxquantization effect is compatible with the presence of persistentcurrents in the ring. The layout is realized, using lithography masksand standard processing techniques, such as deposition, etching andlift-off. In total, four device layers are present, embedded on asubstrate, using three masks:

-   -   Mask for bottom core-parts (5 a, 6 a), which is re-used to form        the top core parts (5 c, 6 c)    -   Mask for rings (1,2,3) and bonding pads    -   Mask for core-tips (5 b, 6 b),

The structures are drawn using the Cadence Virtuoso software. Theyinclude 15 micrometer diameter rings with thicknesses of 2 micrometer.The cores and tips are designed in such a way that all gaps, separationsand minimal distances are 2 micrometer. Optical alignment structures anda passivation layer are included as well. The corresponding opticallithography masks are made in-house. A process-flow is set up, usingthese masks to build the device on two-inch Si wafers in about twentyprocessing steps. The crucial step is to connect the top and bottomparts of the cores by making trenches (15) going through the rings, butnot touching them. These trenches (15) are needed for the core-tips asto form closed structures. Simulations have supported the idea of usingthe ferromagnetic cores. 99% of the flux can be guided from an inputring (2) to a free ring (1), and 49% of that flux can be guided to anoutput ring (3). Two cores (5,6) share the available area on the freering (1). There is sufficient coupling to get enough flux for creating apersistent current in a superconducting ring (1). The small cores enableus to use low current signals and still achieve relatively high magneticfields which doesn't exceed the critical field strength of thesuperconductive material used. In one example a system comprising threerings of 6 micrometer diameter and thickness of 1 micrometer aresimulated, using NiFe cores of permeability 75000. An input current of10 mA in the first ring produced fields up to 0.118 T inside the coresand was sufficient to achieve the desired coupling. A soft permalloywith high permeability will switch its magnetic moments, according tothe frequency of the driving signal, and continuously guide the fluxfrom one ring to another. Signals in the range of a few micro-Ampere upto 100 milli-Ampere with frequencies below 100 MHz are sufficient to notexceed the saturation field of the permalloy and also to enablesynchronized switching between the core and the magnetic field. Theresults indicate that using superconducting aluminium rings incombination with the ferromagnetic cores (permalloy NiFe, μ˜75000) aresuitable candidates as quantum bits. Injecting input currents of 1 mA,alike the signal shown in FIG. 2F, up to frequencies of 1–10 MHzproduces magnetic fields of around 1 T inside the cores, just below thesaturation point of the permalloy (1.1 T). The flux coupling achieveddepends on the spatial arrangement of the cores. In order to trap one ormultiples of the London flux quantum φ₀, a minimum coupling of 50% isrequired between the input ring and the floating ring (computingelement). The local fluxes are in the order of 10⁻¹³ Wb and animprovement to the free-field case of about two to three times 10² isachieved. The simulations confirmed the feasibility of the qbitarchitecture and the structures are currently being processed, becausethe devices under investigation are not only capable of emulating aregister of quantum bits but also contain extremely small transformerswith permalloy cores to improve the flux guiding.

1. A device comprising: at least two computational elements, eachcomputational element being shaped as a ring-like structure, whereineach computational element is magnetically coupled to at least oneadjacent computational element; and an interface structure configured toprovide magnetic access to the computational elements.
 2. The device ofclaim 1, wherein said ring-like structure comprises a ring having asingle hole therein.
 3. The device of claim 1, wherein saidcomputational element is magnetically coupled with the at least oneadjacent computational element by sharing the core of a transformer. 4.The device of claim 1, wherein the interface structure comprises atleast one input-output element, and wherein each of said input-outputelements is magnetically coupled to an adjacent computational element.5. The device of claim 1, wherein the interface structure comprises: atleast one input element and at least one output element, said inputelement and said output element being magnetically coupled to anadjacent computational element.
 6. The device of claim 1, wherein saidcomputational elements are positioned in a two-dimensional array, and atleast one of the computational elements at a border of thistwo-dimensional array is coupled to an input element, and wherein atleast one of the other computational elements at the border of thistwo-dimensional array is coupled to an output element.
 7. The device ofclaim 1, wherein each of the at least two computational elements isconfigured to change its conductive state from superconducting to ohmicconduction in response to a magnetic pulse.
 8. The device of claim 1,further comprising a circuit configured to provide a current to theinput element, and another circuit configured to receive a current fromthe output element.
 9. The device of claim 1, wherein the ring-likestructure is configured as a closed structure to allow a closed currentflow therein.
 10. The device of claim 1, wherein the computationalelement comprises a topological space of genus
 1. 11. The device ofclaim 1, wherein the device comprises a quantum computer.
 12. The deviceof claim 1, wherein each of the at least two computational elementscomprises a closed-ring structure having a single hole.
 13. The deviceof claim 2, wherein said ring comprises a superconducting material oftype I.
 14. The device of claim 4, wherein said input-output element isconfigured as a semi-closed ring.
 15. The device of claim 5, whereineach of said input element and output element is magnetically coupled toan adjacent computational element by sharing the core of a transformer.16. The device of claim 9, wherein the ring-like structure is positionedbetween the interface structure and another interface structure, andwherein each interface structure comprises a semi-closed ring shapedelement.
 17. The device of claim 16, wherein one of the semi-closed ringshaped elements operates as in input for receiving a time-dependentcurrent signal, and the other semi-closed ring shaped element operatesas an output for outputting a current signal.
 18. The device of claim17, wherein the time-dependent current signal is indicative ofinformation in a quantum system.
 19. The device of claim 12, wherein theat least two closed-ring structures are magnetically coupled to computeinformation.
 20. A device comprising, at least two computationalelements, each computational element being shaped as a ring-likestructure, wherein each computational element is magnetically coupled toat least one adjacent computational element by sharing the core of atransformer, said core comprising a permalloy; and an interfacestructure configured to provide magnetic access to the computationalelements.
 21. A device comprising: at least two quantum computationalelements, each quantum computational element being shaped as a ring-likestructure, wherein each quantum computational element is magneticallycoupled to at least one adjacent quantum computational element; and aninterface structure configured to provide magnetic access to the quantumcomputational elements.
 22. The device of claim 21, wherein thering-like structure comprises a ring having a single hole therein. 23.The device of claim 21, wherein each quantum computational element ismagnetically coupled with the at least one adjacent quantumcomputational element by sharing the core of a transformer.
 24. Thedevice of claim 21, wherein the interface structure comprises at leastone input-output element, and wherein each of said input-output elementsis magnetically coupled to an adjacent quantum computational element.25. The device of claim 21, wherein the interface structure comprises:at least one input element and at least one output element, the inputelement and the output element being magnetically coupled to an adjacentquantum computational element.
 26. The device of claim 21, wherein thequantum computational elements are positioned in a two-dimensionalarray, and at least one of the quantum computational elements at aborder of this two-dimensional array is coupled to an input element, andwherein at least one of the other quantum computational elements at theborder of this two-dimensional array is coupled to an output element.27. The device of claim 21, wherein each of the at least two quantumcomputational elements is configured to change its conductive state fromsuperconducting to ohmic conduction in response to a magnetic pulse. 28.The device of claim 21, further comprising a circuit configured toprovide a current to the input element, and another circuit configuredto receive a current from the output element.
 29. The device of claim21, wherein the ring-like structure is configured as a closed structureto allow a closed current flow therein.
 30. The device of claim 21,wherein the quantum computational element comprises a topological spaceof genus
 1. 31. The device of claim 21, wherein the device comprises aquantum computer.
 32. The device of claim 21, wherein each of the atleast two quantum computational elements comprises a closed-ringstructure having a single hole.
 33. The device of claim 22, wherein thering comprises a superconducting material of type I.
 34. The device ofclaim 23, wherein the core comprises a permalloy.
 35. The device ofclaim 24, wherein the input-output element is configured as asemi-closed ring.
 36. The device of claim 25, wherein each input elementand output element is magnetically coupled to an adjacent quantumcomputational element by sharing the core of a transformer.
 37. Thedevice of claim 29, wherein the ring-like structure is positionedbetween the interface structure and another interface structure, andwherein each interface structure comprises a semi-closed ring shapedelement.
 38. The device of claim 37, wherein one of the semi-closed ringshaped elements operates as in input for receiving a time-dependentcurrent signal, and the other semi-closed ring shaped element operatesas an output for outputting a current signal.
 39. The device of claim38, wherein the time-dependent current signal is indicative ofinformation in a quantum system.
 40. The device of claim 32, wherein theat least two closed-ring structures are magnetically coupled to computeinformation.